Comments for peer group’s pitch

Jobitti


This pitch was especially well rehearsed compared to the others, the two speakers also worked well together. the start of the pitch clearly established the problem and the overall style of the pitch seemed professional. They did not utilize the PowerPoint at all but that made little impact because the pitch was very clear and the aim of the project came across well. The teams resources and roles of its members was a nice addition. What the pitch lacked was a clear view of the exact look or feel of the game being delivered and as the pitch was a bit short at about two minutes there was time to include more.

Know Your Hoods


Know your hoods-teams pitch stood out from the rest with its relaxed style. With only one speaker the pitch had a good flow and the problem and solution as well as the resources were all made very clear. Their PowerPoint had a bit more text than necessary but as some of the slides were referenced during the pitch it wasn't a huge problem. The pitch was on the shorter side with just over one and half minutes of time used, so there could have been more additions to the actual solution part of the pitch, then again keeping the pitch short may have been a good choice as they were able to get there point across and it was very easy to concentrate the whole time.

Week 2 update: Start of the new year

As the break ended and the team was well rested we began work right where we left off. First we made some finishing touches to our pitch and the pitching team began to practice. Now that we have a clear picture of where the project is headed from the project owner as well as the information from Toyota the programming can finally begin. We divided the team into two groups one of witch will work on the front end and the other will develop the back end. The next week will be spent pitching and setting the first tasks for the programming groups.